CPFdn Report Studies
Engaged Grantmaking in Local Communities
Arm in Arm: Engaged Grantmaking
in Local Communities is a study commissioned by
Cherokee Preservation Foundation. The report
focuses on challenges and strategies for
grantmakers whose mission requires them
to make grants over many years in communities
that have a limited number of nonprofit
organizations appropriate for grant support
and a limited number of individuals with
the experience and skill required to lead
those organizations. The findings summarized
here are based on interviews with approximately
30 individuals working in a range of settings,
including grantmaking to First Nations,
Native American and Aboriginal Peoples;
grantmaking in rural areas; and grantmaking
in developing countries.
These communities
in which these grantmakers work often have
the following similarities:
- Limited choice of potential grantees.
- Limited number of potential leaders
for community organizations.
- Few philanthropic resources.
- Long-term relationship between grantmaking
institution and community.
- A sense that the community is entitled
to the grantmaking resources.
- A culture that differs significantly
from the mainstream
What are the implications
of these characteristics for grantmaking
practice? First, it means
that the grantmaker’s legitimacy
comes from serving the needs of the community.
To gain and maintain legitimacy, the grantmaker
must be a steward for the community’s
endowment. This is not the case in many
other settings, where the grantmaker’s
legitimacy derives from adherence to the
will of the benefactor.
For the grantmaker,
it also means that development of local
capacity is as important
as achieving specific program goals. The
grantmaking process must develop individual
leaders for both the staff and boards of
local organizations. It also must develop
the capacities of the organizations themselves.
Finally,
it means that the grantmaker needs to be
an engaged partner with its grantees.
In many other settings, most of the work
of the grantmaking staff is devoted to
choosing grantees and structuring grants.
Such staff spend little time with grantees
after the grant is awarded. In these settings,
in contrast, staff spend a significant
proportion of time with grantees in coaching,
supporting, and learning.
These four strategies—being
a steward for the community, developing
leaders,
developing organizations, and being an
engaged partner—are at the core of
successful grantmaking in these challenging
settings.
|