ADULT
LEADERSHIP PROGRAMS
Lessons
Learned in Leadership Programming
Leadership
programming has been in existence for a number
of years and a lot can be learned
from these experiences about leadership development.
A review of the Kellogg National Fellowship/Leadership
Program (KNLP), a leader in the field of leadership,
identified lessons learned and competencies
of leadership that were revealed over the course
of the twenty-two year program that integrated
transformational and servant leadership principles.
The design of KNLP was developed based on the
following assumptions about leadership: leadership
can be learned, it is relational, and it is
a process; adults learn best through experiential
learning and when they set their own agenda;
leaders must look at issues from a multi-disciplinary
lens; and leaders must have passion in order
to bring about change and learn to take risks.
The review of the program, which involved
formal evaluation and informal observation,
identified
lessons learned (suggestions and transferable
applications) that could be used as a framework
for developing personal and group leadership.
The lessons learned included the following:
- Opportunity for reflection
is a necessary element of leadership development.
Participants must
be given time and space to step outside
their normal routines of job and family life
in order
to maximize the time spent on the process
of leadership development.
-
Leadership training
and application must be given a context.
To develop leadership,
participants must have a particular issue or body of knowledge
with which to work.
-
The interactive nature
of participants in a group setting is crucial
in
leadership development.
Opportunities to exchange ideas,
work collectively, and build shared experiences
create a setting
in which leadership can develop.
Leadership requires trusting relationships and developing
trust among individuals requires
time and opportunity.
-
Morals, ethics, and spirituality are necessary
elements in leadership development. The ability
to understand one’s self makes a
person a more effective leader. Leadership
programming
needs to include opportunities for internal
and external experiences. Leaders acknowledge
the important role of having an ethical
and spiritual dimension within leadership
development.
-
Leaders must have
an interdisciplinary perspective to social
issues. Leaders need
broad knowledge
about issues before they take action
to bring about change. Leaders must be given
the opportunity
to learn about issues from different
disciplines and must be able to use critical
thinking skills
(e.g., listening, evaluation, synthesis)
to process the information presented. Persons
from one profession or field of specialty
cannot
independently solve social issues.
-
Emerging leaders benefit from experiences across
social and economic lines, and international
borders. In today’s global economy, leaders
must be aware of that which takes place outside
of our community and our country’s
borders. There is no substitute to learning
about issues
from the people who experience it or who
experience it from a position in life different
from your
own (whether racial, cultural, or economic)
to provide perspective.
-
Leaders must understand the complexity of diversity
and the value of creating community among diverse
individuals, groups, or cultures. Leaders cannot
ignore the issue and value of diversity in
today’s world.
-
Leaders need mentors to continue
to develop. Mentors are an essential element
to
leadership development. The mentors chosen
need to
be experienced leaders who can communicate about
their own journeys to help others grow.
-
Acknowledging a person’s leadership role
or ability contributes to that person’s
effectiveness as a leader. Recognizing
a person (not in a traditional position
of leadership)
as a leader or an emerging leader can inspire
and give authenticity to that person as
a leader.
In addition to the lessons learned during
the review of the KNLP, seven leadership competencies
were identified as being reinforced within
the program elements. These competencies
provide
the foundation for effective leaders.
-
Self-Knowledge.
Leaders know how to use their strengths
and know how to manage their
weaknesses; and are able to assume responsibility
for their own decisions and actions.
Leaders also know what they stand for (their
ethics,
morals, and values).
-
Interpersonal Skills
Ability. Leaders have the ability and the
resolve to apply
effective
interpersonal skills to manage and resolve
conflict, empower others, and to build
and maintain relationships.
-
Flexibility and
Adaptability. Leaders understand that change
is inevitable and
that flexibility
and adaptability are required to successfully
address challenges or issues that arise.
-
Creative Thinking. Leaders use creative
thinking to find solutions to new or old
problems.
-
Commitment to Service.
Leaders possess a strong commitment to serve
and an
ability
to
be sensitive to individual needs.
- Technological
Mastery. Leaders understand the role of
technology and are able to utilize
it.
- Public Policy. Leaders
understand the role of public policy, have
a working knowledge
of how policy is made, and are able to
navigate and build partnerships among the
various
public sectors.
Over the years leadership
has started becoming synonymous with service.
This shift can be
seen both in the business and non-profit
sectors and is reflected in leadership programming
and study. “Servant-leadership,” a
term coined by Robert K. Greenleaf in 1970,
is increasingly viewed as an ideal leadership
form that exhibits “a way of being
in relationship with others.”
Characteristics
of the servant-leader include:
-
Listening.
The servant-leader must actively listen
in order to identify or clarify the
will of a group. Active listening is
done by listening and being receptive to
what
is being
said and to what is not being said.
-
Empathy.
The servant-leader knows how to empathize
with others, recognizing that
there
is a difference between actions and
behaviors and the underlying person.
- Healing.
The ability to heal one’s
self and one’s relationship with
others is one of the strengths of servant-leadership.
- Awareness. Awareness, general
and personal, enables one to understand issues
involving
ethics, power, and values and to view
issues from a more integrated holistic position.
-
Persuasion. Servant-leaders rely on persuasion
and building consensus instead
of on coercion
from their position of authority.
-
Conceptualization.
Servant-leaders must balance conceptual
thinking and thinking
about day-to-day operations. Being
able to think
beyond the day-to-day realities and
to envision a broader plan requires discipline
and practice.
- Foresight. The ability
to see the likely outcome of a situation
based on past experiences,
current realities and future decisions.
-
Stewardship. A view that
all institutions are held in trust for the
greater good
of society. It also reinforces the
use of persuasion
versus
control.
-
Commitment to the growth
of people. Servant-leaders believe that people
have
value beyond their
identities as workers; therefore, they
have a responsibility to assist the
personal
and
professional growth of those led.
The above
characteristics (although not exhaustive)
are viewed as vital to the
development of
servant-leaders.
Additional information
relevant to developing a leadership program
in Cherokee can be
learned from the experience of community
and rural
development projects that focused on
leadership development. These lessons include:
-
Measure
success in terms of the people served, not
the number of issues addressed. Leadership
development is about people.
-
Focus on people issues
(not leadership theory) in leadership training
and include activities
that provide for experiential learning
and require participant interaction and dialogue.
-
Know your audience.
Ask what type of training would be most beneficial.
People who are given
the opportunity to self-direct
learning gain the most from it.
-
Evaluate and adapt
programs as necessary to meet participant
needs. The program must have
the flexibility to grow and change
to meet the needs of participants.
-
Find project leaders
and staff who share the goal of developing
leadership capacity in your
target audience (e.g., American
Indian community members, youth, women, elected
officials).
The attitudes, sensitivities and
skills of project leaders are important.
Trainers should
be patient, sensitive, and open
to learning about other cultures, not sympathetic
or patronizing.
-
Recruit applicants
through personal invitations instead of public
notices or general mailings.
-
Leadership development
and community action are closely tied together.
-
Provide financial
support for action projects to allow participants
to exercise
their training.
Implementation of an action project
can provide the experiential foundation for
participants
to become confident in their ability
to take
on larger community action projects.
The
above lessons all serve to provide useful
guidance in the formulation of
a leadership
program or in the review of potential
programs to replicate or adapt for
a given community.
However, there is one critical lesson
missing from the findings in regard
to the development
of leadership programming for American
Indian communities. Leadership programming
designed
for American Indians must include information
and training specific to the unique
status of American Indian tribes both politically
and culturally.
This lesson is evidenced
by a review
of the successful, more comprehensive
leadership
programs designed for American Indians
and
their communities. Although American
Indian cultures are not uniform, the following
common characteristics
of traditional
forms of leadership have been identified:
-
Spirituality was a
core element of American Indian life and
all leadership possessed spiritual
significance.
-
Leaders demonstrated
generosity and kindness, and honored all
living things.
-
Elders cultivated
the leadership of future generations.
-
American Indian leaders
were humble servants to the community. Individuals
did
not seek
leadership. Leaders emerged from their
contributions to the community and the
people recognized
and selected those considered
most able to lead.
-
No one person was
always a leader and many were leaders at
different times.
-
The community could
cease to recognize leaders by simply choosing
to not follow him or her.
-
American Indian leaders
led by example rather than by authority or
command.
-
American Indian leaders
took their time when making a decision. When
they gave their word
on a decision it was a final, binding pledge.
-
When tribal leaders
met to deliberate on a matter they sought
understanding and consensus
through mutual inquiry. There was no debate.
-
American Indian methods
of resolving social conflict were based on
the concept of
restitution
that focused on restoring respectful
personal and social relations.
These characteristics
of traditional
forms of leadership can be used as
to inform
the development of leadership programming.
Sources: “Leadership
Lessons and Competencies: Learning
from the Kellogg National Fellowship
Program,” by
John Beineke and Roger Sublett; “Rural
Lessons Learned,” produced by
the W.K. Kellogg Foundation; and “Traditional
American Indian Leadership: A Comparison
with U.S. Governance” by Tracy
Becker
back to top
|
| about us | what's new | resources | contact | search | site map | home
about our grantees | investments in change | information for applicants
|
|
|
|
|